1. I believe that Coates is trying to get to the point that Americans want to ignore the past that we have done to black lives and just continue living on. But as Coates suggests “If we conclude that the conditions in North Lawndale and black America are not inexplicable but are instead precisely what you’d expect of a community that for centuries has lived in America’s crosshairs, then what are we to make of the world’s oldest democracy?” What does that say about America if we allow this to happen? Is it then normal and anyone would do it? No, that is not true and we should take responsibility for our actions and I believe that is what Coates is saying.
  2. Our country is built on being the “best country in the world” with the most opportunities. If America gave into the reality of being a country driven off of slavery and inequality, then what does that make our country? I believe that is why the House has never passed HR 40; the little bit of recognition of the awful things America has done to become the country it is today will set them off. This is a sad reality and I think Coates wants to make it clear that America as a whole needs to be better and make it clear what we’ve done wrong.
  3. It challenges America’s history and heritage. I believe that it threatens the people who create this idea of patriotism and how amazing America is and always has been. For me personally, It doesn’t hurt my opinions on our country whatsoever. If anything, I would have more respect for this country if they did something about the past. I do agree with Coates though because I do feel like it would challenge a lot of peoples thoughts on America’s history.
  4. It challenges the myth because it opens up the truths about how America is not perfect. Coate put it perfectly when saying “its innocence into a wisdom worthy of its founders.” America is not innocent in any way shape or form. Taking a look at the past and trying to change is a better America for everyone. Ignoring it will not do anything but look ignorant.